In a casual way I noticed that a couple of the papers we receive both chose to editorialize on the importance of the Copenhagen Climate Summit which begins today.
Then I saw another editorial promoting the urgency of Climate change. Hmm. Seems many editorial writers from around the country made a group decision to promote this and ignore or wave off new evidence that the science may have been tricked up to suit a preconceived opinion.
Well, I'm not as paranoid as I thought. Seems there is an agreement by 56 newspapers in 46 countries to put out the same editorial today. "14 days to seal history's judgement on this generation." Other papers seem to have followed suit without signing an agreement.
From the Guardian:
"Today 56 newspapers in 45 countries take the unprecedented step of speaking with one voice through a common editorial. We do so because humanity faces a profound emergency."
What good are newspapers if they merely carry water for one point of view, one set of numbers. Where is a profound and bias neutral look at what lies beneath all this.
Yes, some profound emergency which will be talked about by attendees at a conference in Copenhagen putting out more CO2 than many countries do in a year. Riding around in limousines and jetting in on private planes.
Sure, we'll all believe whatever you have to say.




